Hazirgah

Bu rapor İngilizce yayımlanmaktadır. Türkçe özet için ana sayfadaki veri bölümüne bakabilirsiniz.

Türkiye startup capital · multi-source synthesis

Türkiye Deal Pulse

The Q2 2026 quarter set against a five-year record, reconciled across twelve data publishers — because the headline number and the underlying market have been moving in opposite directions.

Latest quarter Q2 2026
Q2 2026 headline volume
$559.4M
40 deals · flat vs. Q1 2026's $559.2M
Of which actual venture
$104.2M
81.4% of the headline was M&A, not investment
Foreign share of value
97%
11 of 40 deals · locals led 29 and supplied $17M
Late-stage rounds
0
None in Q2 2026; 6 in all of 2025

Five years, two opposite trends

KPMG/212 basis · deal volume split by type

The ecosystem's deal count has risen every single year — 255 → 277 → 297 → 331 → 360. Its venture funding has collapsed. What fills the headline number instead is acquisition value, which is money leaving the ecosystem to existing shareholders rather than capital entering companies. 2024, not 2021, was the peak year.

Venture funding (seed + early + late) Acquisitions / exit value
2022
$1.84B total · 277 deals
2023
$497M total · 297 deals
2024
$2.6B total · 331 deals
2025
$1.4B total · 360 deals
2026 H1
$1.12B total · 82 deals
Read the blue bars, not the totals. Venture funding ran $1.5B (2022) → ~$308M (2023) → $1.1B (2024) → $490M (2025) → $154M in H1 2026. Annualised, 2026 is tracking back to the 2023 trough. 2021 sat at $1.4B across 255 deals; the venture/acquisition split for that year was not published. The 2023 split is derived by subtraction, not stated by the source.

The concentration problem

One deal has carried each year

Turkish venture totals are not a market average — they are a single transaction plus noise. In every year of the past five, one deal accounted for 21–50% of the entire national figure, and in Q2 2026 a single acquirer, Uber, was 78% of the quarter.

Largest deal as a share of the year
2022 · Getir
42%
2023 · Insider
21%
2024 · Hepsiburada
43%
2025 · Trendyol Go
50%
Q2 2026 · Getir Yemek
60%
Q2 2026 — one buyer, two deals
$435M
Uber's two Getir transactions
of
$559.4M
the entire quarter, all 40 deals
Uber has now bought Trendyol Go (2025, $700M), Getir Yemek (2026, $335M) and 15% of Getir Perakende Lojistik (2026, $100M). This is one foreign strategic consolidating one national market — closer to the cleanup of a failed category than to ecosystem maturity.

Local investors show up; foreign capital pays

The structural fact — visible in the quarter and the full year alike

This is not a Q2 artefact. Across all of 2025, local investors led 318 of 360 deals and supplied $227M, while 42 foreign-led deals supplied $1,145M. The pattern intensified in Q2 2026.

FY 2025 — share of deal count
318 local
42
FY 2025 — share of deal value
$227M
$1,145M foreign
Q2 2026 — share of deal count
29 local
11 foreign
Q2 2026 — share of deal value
97% foreign · $542.6M
Q2 2026 foreign volume by investor origin
United States
$439M
United Kingdom
$83M
Saudi Arabia
$20M
UAE, Bulgaria, Singapore, Jordan
$1M

The ₺422 billion that isn't venture capital

Why local investors lead so many deals and fund so little

Türkiye has built an enormous regulated venture-fund industry that barely invests in startups. The GSYF (girişim sermayesi yatırım fonu) count went from a standing start in 2014 to 477 funds holding ₺422.6bn — roughly $10bn — by end-2025. In that same year those funds and every other local investor combined deployed $227M into startups. The wrapper is a tax structure first and a venture fund second.

₺422.6bn
GSYF assets under management across 477 funds and 17,900 qualified investors, end-2025
yet only
$227M
total capital supplied by all local investors into Turkish startups during 2025
What drives the gap. Three provisions reward holding a fund unit rather than building a venture business: fund-level income is exempt from corporate tax (KVK 5/1-d) with withholding reduced to zero; corporates deduct allocations to VC funds against taxable income (KVK 10/1-g); and since 1 January 2024, any company whose R&D or teknopark exemption exceeds ₺2m must place 3% of the exempt amount into a venture fund, capped at ₺100m, or forfeit 20% of the benefit. That mandate manufactures a high volume of small compliance cheques — which is exactly what the deal data shows.

Where the ladder breaks

Q2 2026 stage mix, and the missing rungs above it
Q2 2026 — deal count vs. deal value by stage
Seed
31 · $34M
Acquisition
8 · $455M
Early stage
1 · $70M
Late stage
0 · —

Bar length shows deal count; the value beside each row is the dollar figure. The single early-stage deal — Grand Games at $70M — was worth twice the entire seed market.

The Series B void
~7–13%
Turkish seed-to-next-round graduation rate, against roughly 50% in developed markets
$24M
Total disclosed late-stage value across all of 2025, from just 6 deals
Graduation-rate figures are Turkish market-participant estimates (Entertech, egirişim), not audited data — directionally consistent across sources, but attribute rather than assert.

Türkiye raises less than countries a fraction of its size

FY2025 new venture funding per capita, USD

With 85.7 million people, Türkiye deploys roughly $5.15 of venture capital per head per year — level with Romania, a fifth of Poland's, one forty-fifth of Estonia's. Israel, excluded from the chart because it would flatten everything else, runs at about $1,545 per head — roughly 300× Türkiye.

Estonia
$235
UAE
$182
Saudi Arabia
$145
Greece
$77
Czechia
$55
Poland
$24
Romania
$6
Türkiye
$5.15
Saudi Arabia's figure is materially debt-inflated — $4bn of MENA's $7.5bn 2025 total was debt financing. EUR conversions at ~1.10 are approximate, and unicorn counts are not methodologically consistent between sources. Türkiye's figure uses new venture funding (~$441M), not the $1.4bn headline that includes exit proceeds.

A decade of exits — and one thing that has never happened

Disclosed values only

Dealroom tracks 102 Turkish acquisitions totalling $6.6bn in disclosed value since 2010 — sixteen years of a national ecosystem adding up to less than one mid-cap US software deal. More striking: no Turkish startup has ever exited above roughly $50M to a domestic buyer. The two largest domestic acquisitions on record, both 2025, are highlighted below.

CompanyYearAcquirerBuyer originSectorValue
Peak Games2020ZyngaUSAGaming$1.80B
Hepsiburada (65%)2024–25Kaspi.kzKazakhstanE-commerce$1.13B
Trendyol (majority)2018AlibabaChinaE-commerce$728M
Trendyol Go (85%)2025UberUSADelivery$700M
Yemeksepeti2015Delivery HeroGermanyDelivery$589M
Getir Yemek (100%)2026UberUSADelivery$335M
Gram Games2018ZyngaUSAGaming$250M
Rollic (80%)2020ZyngaUSAGaming$168M
iyzico2019PayU / ProsusNetherlandsFintech$165M
Getir Perakende Lojistik (15%)2026UberUSAQ-commerce$100M
Easycep2025Oleka / Repie / ZiraatTürkiyeRecommerce$45M
Carvak2025Borusan NextTürkiyeAutomotive$30M
Gaming is the one repeatable path. Five of the ten largest exits are gaming, and Dealroom finds Türkiye over-indexes in gaming at 31% of national venture capital against roughly 0% globally. Zynga alone completed seven-plus Turkish transactions between 2017 and 2022. No Turkish gaming company has ever IPO'd.

The Getir correction

Context for why acquisition value is flattering the 2025–26 numbers
$11.8B
Series E valuation, March 2022 — Türkiye's only decacorn outside Trendyol
became
$435M
total Uber paid in 2026 for the delivery arm plus 15% of retail logistics

Getir raised roughly $2.4bn, exited every market outside Türkiye by May 2024, was taken over entirely by Mubadala that September, and had group assets valued at $374M in 2025 court documents. The category failed globally — Gorillas, Zapp, Buyk and Jokr all collapsed — so this is not a distinctively Turkish failure. But it consumed a disproportionate share of all capital ever deployed in the market, and the 2026 acquisition value now boosting Türkiye's headline is the salvage of that position, recorded as ecosystem activity.

Turkish founders abroad raise more than Türkiye does

2025, startups.watch basis
$589M
raised by startups based in Türkiye across 306 deals
versus
$1.1B
raised by Turkish-founded companies abroad across just 41 deals

Roughly 14× more capital per deal outside the country than inside it. Three diaspora companies reached unicorn status in 2025 — Airalo, Periodic Labs and fal — while domestic AI startups raised $36.4M across 81 deals for the whole year.

Verified diaspora benchmarks
fal
USA · AI infrastructure · Burkay Gür, Görkem Yurtseven
$4.5B valuation
BillionToOne
USA · Diagnostics · Oğuzhan Atay
Nasdaq, ~$4.4B
Periodic Labs
USA · AI for materials · Ekin Doğuş Çubuk
$300M seed
Airalo
Singapore · eSIM · Özdemir, Burak, Akçaylıer
$220M
Monogram
USA · AI · Eren Bali (co-founder, Udemy)
$40M
Diaspora lists in the quarterly reports carry no published definition of "diaspora", and at least one Q2 2026 entry could not be verified as Turkish-founded on independent sourcing. Treat any individual name as requiring its own check before it is relied on.

Who publishes this data

Twelve sources, verified live · September 2026

The most important disclosure first: startups.watch, the underlying database behind the KPMG report and behind the government's own official ecosystem report, is itself operated by 212 and Inveo Ventures — its site footer reads "Powered by 212 & Inveo Ventures." 212 is both co-author of the quarterly review and a co-owner of its data source, and is an active investor in deals the report counts. That is not a reason to distrust the figures, but it is a related-party fact worth stating.

startups.watchRelated party
The primary collector. 20,000+ startups, investors, rounds and acquisitions, incl. Turkish-founded companies globally. Pro $200/yr, API $1,500/yr.
23 consecutive editions back to 2020 — the longest free quarterly series. Includes acquisitions and crypto token deals in headline volume.
The only genuinely independent Turkish primary collector. Investment-only counting, bilingual, reports back to 2020. H1 2026: $178M / 101 rounds.
Official annual, but authored by startups.watch. Uniquely covers angels, CVC, GSYF counts and public programme funding.
Monthly Excel of actual GSYF/GSYO venture investments from 2020. Turkish-only and badly under-used — the best machine-readable series available.
Legal register of approved funds plus the governing communiqué (III-52.4). Authoritative for fund status; not an analytical dataset.
Live ecosystem dashboard: 9 unicorns, 102 tracked acquisitions, $6.6bn disclosed exit value, sector over/under-indexing. Platform access is enterprise-priced.
$19B ecosystem value, 125 exits, 8.8-year average time to exit. Rolling multi-year windows — not comparable to calendar quarters.
Survey-based ICT market size (₺2.1tn in 2025), employment and exports. The only source for sector scale rather than deal flow.
31.6K companies, 2,916 funding rounds. Broad automated coverage, thinner Turkish-specific verification.
Semi-annual Europe & Türkiye reports with Tech.eu data, plus the dominant Turkish tech news desk. Strong on narrative, secondary on numbers.
Global rank #45, 1,575 startups. Useful for ranking narrative only; methodology is not disclosed publicly.
These sources do not reconcile, and the difference is definitional. For H1 2026: KPMG/212 report $1.12bn (includes acquisitions and crypto tokens), Startupcentrum $178M across 101 rounds (investment only), Dealroom $636M (Istanbul LTM). Any chart that blends them without normalising will mislead. Notably absent: no Deloitte, EY or PwC Türkiye equivalent exists, and Endeavor's Istanbul ecosystem map has not been updated since roughly 2020.

The correction nobody applies

USD reporting versus what a dollar actually buys in Türkiye
6.96×
Turkish consumer price rise, end-2020 to end-2025
against
5.63×
lira depreciation against the dollar over the same window

Inflation outran depreciation, so a dollar buys roughly 19% less inside Türkiye in 2025 than it did in 2020 — less engineering salary, less Istanbul office, less runway. Every figure on this page is reported in USD, which means a flat dollar total is a real-terms cut of about a fifth. USD reporting flatters this ecosystem; it does not understate it.

What this actually means

The exit is a trade sale to a foreign strategic, or there is no exit

Every Turkish exit above roughly $50M in a decade involved a foreign buyer or a foreign public market. The largest domestic acquisition on record is $45M. Both US listings — Hepsiburada and Martı — trade around 78–80% below their debut prices, so the IPO route is not live. Exit planning should assume a cross-border trade sale from the beginning.

The binding constraint is Series B, not seed

Seed is over-supplied by GSYFs writing tax-driven compliance cheques and TÜBİTAK BiGG writing ~₺1.35m pre-seed tickets. Above that, the ladder stops: 6 late-stage deals in all of 2025, zero in Q2 2026, and a seed-to-next-round graduation rate estimated at 7–13% against roughly 50% in developed markets. Founders hit the sell-or-stall decision at Series B rather than Series D.

Incorporation choice is the highest-leverage decision a Turkish founder makes

A Turkish AI founder raised roughly $571K on average domestically in Q1 2026. Diaspora founders raised $8M–$300M in single rounds. The gap is not talent — it is domicile and investor familiarity. That decision gets made before most founders can afford counsel, which is precisely the addressable moment.

Flip timing turns on a two-year clock most founders don't know is running

A share swap into a Delaware or UK holdco is a disposal under Turkish tax law, taxable on appreciation — so a flip is cheapest before the company has value. But share certificates of a fully-taxpayer A.Ş. held more than two years carry an exemption, which can argue for waiting. Entity form, whether physical certificates were ever issued, valuation and grant history all determine which way it cuts. Forming as an A.Ş. with certificates issued on day one starts that clock for free.

Three open questions warrant a dedicated Turkish tax opinion

Nothing in the available Turkish-market commentary resolves stamp duty treatment of a flip share swap, CFC rules as applied to a Delaware topco, or — most consequentially — whether TÜBİTAK BiGG and KOSGEB grants are clawed back on redomiciliation. Given how many Turkish startups take BiGG money, that last one is a live risk sitting under a very large number of cap tables.

"Once companies hit Series A, gravity shifts. Founders don't leave Türkiye because they want to — they leave because capital does."

Investor quoted in Invest Türkiye's official State of the Turkish Startup Ecosystem report
Looking to Q3 2026

KPMG/212 expect AI, gaming and e-commerce to remain dominant, with defence-tech and cybersecurity rising on geopolitical demand. Watch two things the report won't flag: whether any late-stage round prints at all, and whether the 2026 deal count — 40–42 per quarter against roughly 90 through 2025 — reflects a real contraction or a change in counting methodology. That discrepancy is unresolved.